• Home
  • Our Approach
  • What We Do
    • Coaching & Training
    • Consulting
    • Innovation Strategy Workout
  • Bio
  • Blog
  • Contact
When Indecision Rules | 15 October 2015, Frank Devitt

Thirty years ago I worked as middle manager with Moog in Germany. There I had a boss who set the target for his managers that they “should get at least half of their decisions right”. It went without saying that his managers should seek to make decisions and not avoid them.

It is a key job for a manager to make decisions happen. They can make decisions happen better and faster by devolving responsibility and authority to those who are best positioned to make them.

When operational decision-making is centralised the organisation suffers.

  • Poor decisions are made, because decision makers are too distant from information holders, i.e. those who know most.
  • Decisions get delayed because they must take their place in the central queue
  • Bad decisions don’t get challenged, because there is no other authority.
  • Nominal authority holders (VPs, Directors, etc.) are emasculated and lose respect.
  • Political positioning, lobbying and rumour-mongering grows as stakeholders seek to influence an opaque process.

In some organisations, centralised decision making becomes heavily protocol driven and autocratic, even regal. Here, the rationale for decisions is not accessible to ‘ordinary’ staff. The protocol for getting a decision considered dominates over the substance of the issue. Putative decisions by middle managers and other staff get overturned and can’t be relied upon by those who are affected. The decision-making queue for ‘ordinary’ decisions gets infinitely long as the central system is dominated by trophy projects.

The inevitable effect is organisational stasis and growing ineffectiveness in addition to staff demoralisation and disengagement.

To avoid this, organisations should make clear the goals and values that they cherish above all else. They should make sure that staff at all levels are clear on their responsibilities and authority. Staff must be empowered to act, and their actions supported. Bad decisions should be openly challenged, discussed and corrected. Staff must be encouraged to learn from bad decisions, not to fear them. In some crises, it may be a valid option to do nothing different, but that also requires conscious decision.

Inability or unwillingness to decide is one of the great faults of leadership.

posted in | Innovative Organisations, Research

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Related Posts

  • How a Design Thinking mindset improves employee performance
    6 September 2023
    How a Design Thinking mindset improves employee performance

Recent Posts

  • How a Design Thinking mindset improves employee performance
    September 6, 2023
    How a Design Thinking mindset improves employee performance
  • ARRIVE
    May 7, 2021
    ARRIVE
  • Design Thinking: Critical Thinking and Creativity in harmony
    May 1, 2018
    Design Thinking: Critical Thinking and Creativity in harmony
  • Good Design Thinking Practice Needs Process
    March 2, 2018
    Good Design Thinking Practice Needs Process
  • Four Dimensions of Successful Innovation
    February 16, 2018
    Four Dimensions of Successful Innovation

Subscribe to receive the latest in design innovation content from our blog.

HOME

OUR APPROACH
WHAT WE DO
Coaching & Training
Consulting
BIO
BLOG
CONTACT
GET IN TOUCH
+353 86 8280386
frank.devitt@gmail.com
©2017 | Devitt Design Innovation | Developed by Andrew Callan